[LIVE] Bisa Tanya Kebijakan PANRB: Sosialisasi Teknis Pengusulan Zona Integritas Tahun 2026

Kementerian PANRB

7 chapters7 takeaways21 key terms6 questions

Overview

This video provides a technical guide for proposing and evaluating "Zona Integritas" (ZI) units for the year 2026. It details the policy framework, specifically referencing Permenpan RB No. 90/2021 and its amendment Permenpan RB No. 5/2024. The session outlines the necessary requirements for both central government agencies and local governments to nominate units for "Wilayah Bebas dari Korupsi" (WBK) and "Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani" (WBBM) status. It covers eligibility criteria, the evaluation process, submission procedures via the RB National portal, and key deadlines, emphasizing the importance of adhering to standardized formats and procedures.

How was this?

Save this permanently with flashcards, quizzes, and AI chat

Chapters

The session aims to socialize the technical procedures for proposing and evaluating Zona Integritas (ZI) units for 2026.
The policy is based on Permenpan RB No. 90/2021, amended by Permenpan RB No. 5/2024, which governs the development and evaluation of ZI towards WBK/WBBM.
A ministerial decree (Surat Edaran Menteri PAN RB) detailing the technical procedures for 2026 is forthcoming and will be available on the JDIH Ministry of PAN RB.
The focus is on ZI proposals for WBK and WBBM evaluated by the Ministry of PAN RB, with separate discussions planned for self-evaluated ZI units.

Understanding the foundational policies and upcoming guidance is crucial for correctly preparing and submitting ZI proposals.

The session references Permenpan RB No. 90/2021 and Permenpan RB No. 5/2024 as the governing regulations.

At the agency level, requirements include a 'Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian' (WTP) opinion from BPK for 2025 (based on 2024 financial reports), a minimum SAKIP score of 'B' for WBK and 'BB' for WBBM, a minimum RB Index of 'CC' for local governments and 'B' for central agencies for WBK, and 'B' for local governments and 'BB' for central agencies for WBBM.
Maturity level of the Internal Control System (SPIP) must be at least level 3, based on BPKP evaluations from 2024.
At the unit/work unit level, the unit must provide a primary service impacting public perception, have 100% completion of follow-up actions from internal auditors (APIB) and BPK, 100% submission of LHKPN (Asset Declaration) for all employees, and a minimum one-year development period for WBK.
To be proposed for WBBM, a unit must have already achieved WBK status in the previous year (e.g., 2024 for 2026 evaluation).

Meeting these specific eligibility criteria is the first gatekeeping step for any unit aspiring to achieve WBK or WBBM status.

A local government unit needs a 'WTP' opinion from BPK for its 2024 financial report (evaluated in 2025) and a minimum SAKIP score of 'B' to be eligible for WBK proposal.

Six specific types of work units in local governments are designated as national priorities (Stranas PK) and receive affirmative action for ZI proposals towards WBK.
These priority units include Regional Public Hospitals, Civil Registration and Population Services, One-Stop Integrated Service (Samsat), Integrated One-Stop Investment and One-Stop Services (DPMPTSP), educational services (SD, SMP, SMA), and employment services.
For these priority units, the affirmative action means they can be proposed for WBK even if they don't fully meet all standard proposal requirements, such as the one-year development period.
However, if a priority unit already has WBK status and aims for WBBM, the standard WBBM proposal requirements still apply.

This provides a pathway for critical public service units to achieve recognition, even if they face initial hurdles in meeting all standard requirements.

A Regional Public Hospital that hasn't completed a full year of ZI development can still be proposed for WBK due to its status as a national priority unit.

The determination of WBK and WBBM status is based on specific scoring criteria outlined in Permenpan 90.
For WBK, a total score of at least 75 is required, with a minimum score of 40 in the 'pengungkit' (enabler) areas and specific minimums for each of the six reform areas (e.g., 60%).
For WBBM, a total score of at least 85 is required, with a minimum of 48 in 'pengungkit' areas and 75% minimum per reform area.
Key components of the 'hasil' (results) area include perception surveys on anti-corruption (minimum index 3.6/4 for WBK, 3.6/4 for WBBM) and public service quality (minimum index 3.2/4 for WBK, 3.6/4 for WBBM), as well as performance achievement scores.

Understanding these scoring criteria helps units focus their efforts on areas that contribute most significantly to achieving the WBK/WBBM designation.

To achieve WBK, a unit needs a total score of 75, with at least 60% in the 'Manajemen Perubahan' (Change Management) reform area and a perception of anti-corruption survey score of at least 3.6.

The proposal submission period for ZI 2026 is from June 1st to June 30th, 2026, exclusively through the RB National portal (rb.pan.go.id/zi).
The evaluation process includes administrative selection by the National Assessment Team (TPN) to ensure eligibility and determination criteria are met.
A 'sanggah' (rebuttal) phase follows administrative selection, intended for clarifying existing data, not submitting new supporting documents.
Further evaluation may involve document analysis, interviews, and field verification (ferlab), with survey validation and clearance from relevant bodies (KPK, Ombudsman) preceding the final panel decision.

Adhering to the submission timeline and process, including understanding the purpose of each phase, is critical for a successful proposal.

Proposals must be submitted online via the RB National portal between June 1st and June 30th, 2026; physical documents are not accepted.

Required documents include an official proposal letter signed by the agency head, a Statement of Absolute Responsibility (SPTJM), the validated Evaluation Work Sheet (LKE) for each unit, survey reports (SPAK and SPKP), and a statement of follow-up completion for audit findings (TLHP).
All submissions must be made through the RB National portal using existing RB/SAKIP evaluation accounts.
A standardized LKE format is mandatory for 2026; any LKE filled outside this format will be rejected by the system.
Links to drives containing the required documents (proposal letter, SPTJM, TLHP statement, survey reports) must be uploaded, ensuring these links are accessible and not password-protected.

Correctly preparing and uploading all required documents in the specified format and via the designated portal is essential to avoid administrative rejection.

The Evaluation Work Sheet (LKE) must be downloaded from the RB National portal and filled using that specific template; edited or custom templates will be rejected.

After initial submission and LKE upload, a summary page allows for review and editing before final submission.
Final submission can only be done once per agency; subsequent attempts by other accounts will be locked.
The RB National portal will display the status of LKE uploads and imports, providing warnings for format mismatches.
The entire process, from proposal to final decision, is tracked and communicated through the RB National portal.

Finalizing the submission correctly and understanding the portal's feedback mechanisms are crucial for ensuring the proposal is officially registered.

After uploading LKEs, users can return to the summary page to review all submitted information and make final edits before clicking the 'Submit Final' button.

Key takeaways

1The Zona Integritas (ZI) policy aims to build corruption-free and clean, service-oriented bureaucracy in government agencies.
2Strict adherence to eligibility criteria, including audit opinions, performance scores, and internal control maturity, is fundamental for proposing ZI units.
3National priority units in local governments receive some flexibility in proposal requirements for WBK status, but not for WBBM.
4The evaluation process is rigorous, involving administrative checks, potential rebuttals, and in-depth analysis, with clear scoring criteria for WBK and WBBM.
5All ZI proposals and documentation for 2026 must be submitted electronically through the RB National portal within the specified June 2026 window.
6Using the mandatory, standardized LKE format available on the RB National portal is critical to avoid system rejection.
7Effective communication and coordination between work units, internal evaluators (TPI), and agency leadership are vital throughout the ZI process.

Key terms

Zona Integritas (ZI)Wilayah Bebas dari Korupsi (WBK)Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani (WBBM)Permenpan RB No. 90/2021Permenpan RB No. 5/2024Surat Edaran Menteri PAN RBReformasi Birokrasi (RB)Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP)Evaluasi Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LKIP)Penilaian Kinerja (Sakip)Indeks RBMaturitas SPIPBadan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK)Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP)Tim Penilai Internal (TPI)Tim Penilai Nasional (TPN)Lembar Kerja Evaluasi (LKE)Survei Persepsi Anti Korupsi (SPAK)Survei Persepsi Kualitas Pelayanan (SPKP)Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan (TLHP)Surat Pernyataan Tanggung Jawab Mutlak (SPTJM)

Test your understanding

1What are the minimum SAKIP and RB Index scores required for an agency to propose a unit for WBK status?
2Why is it important for units to have at least one year of ZI development before being proposed for WBK?
3How does the affirmative action for national priority units differ for WBK proposals compared to WBBM proposals?
4What are the key differences in the total score and per-area minimum requirements between WBK and WBBM designations?
5What is the primary method for submitting ZI proposals for the 2026 evaluation, and what is the submission deadline?
6Why is it mandatory to use the standardized LKE format provided on the RB National portal for the 2026 evaluation?