1:31:05
The Worst Possible Update: 3.6 Years After The Vaccine
Dave Asprey
Overview
This video features a conversation between Dave Asprey and Dr. Peter McCullough, a physician critical of mainstream pandemic responses. Dr. McCullough discusses his views on the virus, early treatment protocols, the history and ideology behind vaccines, and critiques the suppression of alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. He also delves into the potential manipulation of the spike protein, the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and the scientific and regulatory issues surrounding mRNA vaccine technology, arguing for greater transparency and critical evaluation of public health measures and pharmaceutical interventions.
How was this?
Save this permanently with flashcards, quizzes, and AI chat
Chapters
- The virus was mild for most, with early treatment protocols recommended for vulnerable populations.
- Lockdowns, masks, and business closures were unnecessary and harmful interventions.
- Independent media and podcasters were largely absent or late in addressing the pandemic in 2020.
- Dr. McCullough faced censorship and loss of followers for his dissenting views.
Understanding the initial messaging and the rationale behind alternative approaches is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness and impact of public health strategies during a crisis.
The speaker suggests that public health messaging could have focused solely on advising at-risk individuals on early treatment protocols, avoiding widespread societal disruption.
- Vaccinology has historical roots in mythology and ideology, dating back to Cotton Mather and variolation.
- The concept of 'vaccine hesitancy' being a mental disease or threat to public health is a modern ideological construct.
- Historically, resistance to vaccination has led to severe measures, including jailing parents for not vaccinating children against smallpox.
- The fervor around vaccines can be driven by fear and an unbridled enthusiasm, sometimes overshadowing scientific scrutiny.
Examining the historical and ideological underpinnings of vaccination helps to contextualize current debates and understand the potential for dogma to influence public health policy.
Cotton Mather's proclamation that variolation was a 'gift from God' is presented as an early example of ideology influencing medical practice.
- Hydroxychloroquine was initially accepted and even endorsed by Dr. Fauci, but later suppressed due to fraudulent studies.
- Ivermectin, a safe and effective anti-parasitic drug, also faced a 'war' of suppression, including fraudulent FDA campaigns.
- The FDA and pharmacy boards actively worked to prevent the use of these drugs, despite evidence of their efficacy.
- A billionaire in Australia had his stockpile of hydroxychloroquine seized and destroyed by authorities.
The suppression of potentially life-saving, low-cost treatments raises serious questions about pharmaceutical industry influence and the integrity of regulatory bodies.
The FDA's campaign falsely labeling ivermectin as solely a veterinary product and the AMA's call to 'abolish' its use are cited as examples of organized suppression.
- Misinformation policies, like those from the FTC, can be weaponized to target individuals and companies.
- The term 'misinformation' itself is a propaganda tool, historically used by oppressive regimes.
- Six propaganda terms (misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, anti-science, anti-vaxxer, conspiracy theorist) are used to control narratives and demean dissent.
- Academic 'misinformation indexes' are used to devalue ideas and observations that challenge established narratives.
Recognizing propaganda techniques and understanding the manipulation of language is essential for maintaining cognitive sovereignty and engaging in critical thinking.
The speaker recounts being accused of spreading 'misinformation' by a Senator before even speaking, illustrating the preemptive use of the term as a propaganda tactic.
- The spike protein is identified as the pathogenic component of the virus.
- Research from 2015 indicated the creation of a 'primordial SARS-CoV-2' through gain-of-function research involving bat coronaviruses and human beta coronaviruses.
- This research, funded by NIAID (Anthony Fauci's branch), was published in major scientific journals.
- The CDC's mention of 'nanobots' in vaccines, though later removed, fueled speculation about advanced technologies.
Understanding the potential engineered nature of the virus and the role of the spike protein is critical for developing effective treatments and preventative measures.
The 2015 Nature Medicine paper titled 'A SARS-like bat coronavirus poised for human emergence' is cited as evidence of prior creation of the virus.
- The mRNA in current vaccines uses synthetic pseudouridine, making it resistant to natural degradation by RNA enzymes.
- This synthetic mRNA allows for prolonged production of spike protein in the body, with some individuals showing circulating vaccine and spike protein 3.6 years later.
- There is a significant knowledge gap regarding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mRNA vaccines.
- The spike protein itself is described as 'amyloidogenic' and 'rubbery,' potentially accumulating in tissues and contributing to health issues.
The long-term persistence of spike protein and the synthetic nature of mRNA vaccines raise concerns about potential chronic health effects that require further investigation.
A patient who received three vaccine doses reportedly still has circulating vaccine and spike protein in his bloodstream 3.6 years later, along with multiple health issues.
Key takeaways
- Public health messaging during the pandemic was often flawed, prioritizing fear and control over accurate information and early treatment.
- The history of vaccination is intertwined with ideology and societal control, not solely scientific advancement.
- Effective and safe early treatments for COVID-19 were actively suppressed by powerful entities, including pharmaceutical companies and regulatory bodies.
- The term 'misinformation' is a propaganda tool used to silence dissent and maintain intellectual control.
- Evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 may have originated from gain-of-function research, contrary to official narratives.
- Current mRNA vaccine technology utilizes synthetic components that may lead to prolonged spike protein production and potential long-term health risks.
- Critical evaluation of scientific claims, especially during public health crises, is essential for individual and societal well-being.
Key terms
Spike ProteinHydroxychloroquineIvermectinGain of Function ResearchmRNA VaccinePseudouridineMisinformationPropagandaCognitive SovereigntyAmyloidogenic
Test your understanding
- What were the primary criticisms of the public health response to the virus in 2020?
- How does Dr. McCullough describe the historical and ideological underpinnings of vaccination?
- What evidence does Dr. McCullough present for the suppression of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?
- What are the six propaganda terms discussed, and why does Dr. McCullough avoid using them?
- What is the significance of the 2015 research paper mentioned in relation to the origin of SARS-CoV-2?
- Why is the synthetic nature of mRNA in current vaccines a concern for Dr. McCullough?
- How can understanding the concept of 'cognitive sovereignty' help individuals navigate information during a crisis?