type: cornell_note | pinned: true | subtopic: Rutherford Experiment
Apparatus Image:
Source: Wikimedia Commons — Geiger-Marsden Experiment (expected vs. actual results)
Cue Column | Note-Taking Area
| Cue | Notes |
|---|---|
| What was the experiment? | Alpha particles (He-4 nuclei) fired at a thin gold foil (0.00004 cm thick). Zinc sulfide (ZnS) screen detected scattered particles at various angles. |
| What was observed? | (1) Most alphas: undeflected (straight through). (2) ~1 in 8000: deflected at large angles. (3) Very rarely (1 in ~20,000): bounced nearly straight back (~180°). |
| Conclusion 1 | Most of the atom is empty space (explains undeflected majority). |
| Conclusion 2 | All positive charge and most mass concentrated in a tiny nucleus (~10^{-15} m, called the nucleus). |
| Conclusion 3 | Electrons orbit far from nucleus (~10^{-10} m). |
| Distance of closest approach | d = 2k/KE_α. At this point, all KE converts to electrostatic PE. Gives upper limit on nuclear size. |
| Formula d | d = 2k/KE where k = Nm^{2}$$C^{-2}, Z = target atomic number, e = C. |
| For 5 MeV on Au(Z=79) | d = 2××79×()^{2} / (×) ≈ 45.5 fm |
| Units | [d] = [L]; SI unit: metres (m); typical value: ~10^{-14} m = tens of fm |
| Why Rutherford was shocked | Classical expectation: all alphas should pass through (Thomson "plum pudding" model). Back-scattering was "as if you fired shells at tissue paper and they came back." |
Summary (in own words):
Rutherford's experiment shattered the Thomson model. The overwhelming majority of alpha particles sailed through the gold foil without deflection, confirming the atom is mostly empty space. The rare back-scattering events were explained only if positive charge was concentrated in an incredibly tiny, dense nucleus. The distance of closest approach (d = 2k/KE) gives the maximum radius of the nucleus.
NEET Focus: The formula d = 2k/KE and its application to find nuclear size is frequently tested. Also tested: what each observation concludes.